๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก, ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ , ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ
FEATURE: ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐
๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก, ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ , ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ By: Oriaifoh Godwins The sentencing of four suspected kidnappers to death has understandably generated different reactions across the public space. Some have expressed sympathy. Others have welcomed the judgment, particularly against the background of the fear, trauma and suffering that kidnappings has inflicted on individuals, families and communities. But sentiments apart, there are some fundamental issues that deserve to be noted. First, the fact that the accused persons faced several counts of kidnapping-related offences is significant. It suggests that the case before the court was not simply about one isolated incident. The allegations, as presented before the court, concerned multiple offences. And this raises a sobering question: how many families may have suffered before their final operation at the vegetable market, Benin, which ...